Existence of a dictatorial subgroup in social choice with independent subgroup utility scales, an alternative proof
نویسندگان
چکیده
Social welfare orderings for different scales of individual utility measurement in distinct population subgroups are studied. In Khmelnitskaya and Weymark (2000), employing the continuous version of Arrow’s impossibility theorem, it was shown that for combinations of independent subgroups scales every corresponding social welfare ordering depends on the utilities of only one of the subgroups and is determined in accordance with the scale type proper to this dictatorial subgroup. In this article we introduce an alternative completely self-contained proof based on the study of the structure of level surfaces of a social welfare function which provides a real-valued representation of the social welfare ordering.
منابع مشابه
Some Results for Impossibility Theorems of Social Welfare Function and Social Choice Function
We present some results on social welfare function and social choice function. First, we replace weak Pareto principle of Arrow’s axioms with strong Pareto principle, and then show that assuming unrestricted domain property, independence of irrelevant alternatives and strong Pareto principle on a social welfare function in Arrow’s sense leads to the existence of first to nth commanders whose st...
متن کاملSocial Welfare Orderings for Different Subgroup Utility Scales
This paper characterizes social welfare orderings for different scales of individual utility measurement in distinct population subgroups. Different combinations of ordinal, interval, ratio, and translation scales are studied. We consider situations when utility comparisons among subgroups of individuals by unit and/or zeropoint can or cannot be made, that is when subgroup scales are dependent ...
متن کاملStrategy-proofness versus efficiency in exchange economies: General domain properties and applications
We identify general domain properties that induce the non-existence of efficient, strategy-proof, and non-dictatorial rules in the 2-agent exchange economy. Applying these properties, we establish the impossibility result in several restricted domains; the “intertemporal exchange problem” (without saving technology) with preferences represented by the discounted sum of a temporal utility functi...
متن کاملCharacterization of Domains Admitting Strategy-Proof and Non-Dictatorial Social Choice Functions with Infinite Sets of Alternatives
We show, with an example, that the theorem on the characterization of the domains admitting strategy-proof and non-dictatorial social choice functions by Kalai and Muller (1977) does not hold when the set of alternatives is infinite. We consider two ways of overcoming this problem. The first identifies a set of domains admitting strategy-proof and non-dictatorial social choice functions when th...
متن کاملThe Structure of Strategy-Proof Social Choice Part II: Non-Dictatorship, Anonymity and Neutrality*
Domains of generalized single-peaked preferences are classified in terms of the extent to which they enable well-behaved strategy-proof social choice. Generalizing the Gibbard-Satterthwaite Theorem, we characterize the domains that admit non-dictatorial strategy-proof social choice functions. We also provide characterizations of the domains that enable locally non-dictatorial, anonymous, and ne...
متن کامل